Tänane küsimuste ja vastuste seanss jõuab meile viisakalt SuperUserini - Stack Exchange'i ja kogukonnapõhiste Q & A veebisaitide rühmitusse.
Küsimus
SuperUseri lugeja Cipricus esitab küsimuse:
When a certain file (mp4, flv, etc) has a 95 kbps audio bitrate – does it make sense outputing to a higher bitrate when converting to mp3 or other format (be it lossy or not)?
Would this result in higher audio quality or just in a bigger file?
See on oluline kaalutlus; pole mõtet oma failide suurust suurendada X% -ga, kui helikvaliteeti ei suurene.
Vastus
SuperUseri toetaja Linac pakub oma küsimusele praktilist vastust. Hoolimata sellest, milline populaarne arvamus usub meid, on konversiooni ajal bitikiiruse täiustamiseks praktilised põhjused:
Yes, it might actually make sense if you are being forced to change formats.
If you have a file with 95kbps in a highly efficient format, to retain the same quality, a relatively inefficient format as mp3 needs a higher bitrate.
Of course you will never get anything back that was lost in the first place. On the contrary, encoding as mp3 will reduce the quality further. Every lossy format uses other means to reduce the amount of data that is stored, by (simplified) throwing away “unneeded” parts of the data. Round trip through a bunch of different formats and there won’t be much left …
So if you want to stay as close a possible to the quality your file has now, you should chose a higher bitrate. 320kbps are probably wasted space, but for mp3 something in the order between 128 and 192 is needed to maintain – or at least come close to – the quality of a more efficient 95kbps file.
Kas teil on seletamiseks midagi lisada? Helistage kommentaarides. Kas soovite lugeda rohkem vastuseid teistelt tech-savvy Stack Exchange'i kasutajatelt? Tutvu täieliku arutelu teemaga siit.
